|
HyperOs Systems
Introduce Hyper Drive IV |
|
Specifications:
Connections - SATA 133 and PATA 133
Form factor - Standard 5.25" CD bay
RAM Requirements - Up to 8 x 1GB DDR1
sticks on the 8GB HyperDrive IV and up to 8 x 2GB DDR1 sticks on the
16GB HyperDrive IV. All sticks should be standard ECC registered
DDR1. The HyperDrive IV has 2 banks of 4 DDR slots, each bank must
have the same total amount of RAM. All sticks in any one bank should
be of equal size.
For example - (Bank A) 4x1GB and
(Bank B) 2x2GB = 8GB total
|
 |
|
HyperDrive IV benefits and capabilities. |
|
Librarian analogy. |
|
A data storage device such as a
Magnetic hard disk drive (HDD) or a Flash RAM solid state disk (SSD)
or a Dynamic RAM solid state disk (SSD) is an electronic library.
Its performance is defined by two parameters: Seek Time and
Sustained Transfer Rate (STR). Its seek time is the speed of its
librarian. Its sustained transfer rate is the number of books you
can borrow per day.
The best performing HDDs (10,000 rpm
Western Digital Raptor for example) have a seek time of around 8
milliseconds and a STR of around 65MB per second. The H4 SSD has a
seek time of 40 microseconds and a STR of 123MB per second. So its
librarian is 200 times faster at finding books and you can borrow
around twice as many books per day from its library. |
|
Mechanics versus electronics. |
|
 The
HDD stores its data on a magnetically coated glass rotating
mechanical platter and the data is read by a mechanical arm with a
pick-up head which swings to and fro over the disk. This is
basically gramophone technology. The SDD, on the other hand, stores
its data in DDR. Dynamic RAM is Random Access Memory so any bit of
data can be accessed from any part of the library in around 40
microseconds. The platter of the Western Digital Raptor rotates at
10,000 rpm and is around 10 cm in diameter. So it has an edge speed
of 52.36 metres per second or around 120 mph. For such a device to
achieve the performance of the HyperDrive IV it would have to spin
200 times faster. It would therefore need to spin at 2,000,000 rpm,
in which case it would have an edge speed of 10,472 metres per
second or 24,000 miles per hour. This is over 31 times the speed of
sound. It is faster than Mach 31! The escape velocity for the space
shuttle to leave Earth’s Gravitational field is a mere 22,000 mph!
All the processes in a
modern PC are carried out in Megahertz and Gigahertz, but the
mechanical hard drive is rotating at 167 Hertz (167 revolutions per
second). It is therefore the last bottleneck in PC performance.
There is a sense in which a modern PC is a ludicrously
over-specified mechanical hard drive controller. |
|
Real world performance improvements. |
|
 |
| Windows operating
systems (Microsoft) and hard drive manufacturers have had a lot of
time to get the most out of the mechanical hard drive. And they have
done a very good job. Windows nowadays typically has a 1GB Dynamic
RAM workspace which it loads files into from the HDD and once the
files are in memory the mechanical nature of the HDD is no longer an
obstacle to performance. Furthermore the modern HDD has a solid
state cache of between 2MB and 16MB (Megabytes, not Gigabytes)
which, if carefully managed, can mimic SSD performance in certain
limited circumstances.
So for general everyday PC
operations such as word documents, emails, spread sheets, small
databases, websites etc, there is no real processing time advantage
to be gained from the HyperDrive IV. However there is a real
advantage to the user in everyday situations because program
starting latency is vastly reduced. So the PC feels 'instant'. For
example Photoshop opens in 3 seconds on the HyperDrive IV rather
than 7/8 seconds on a Western Digital Raptor (currently the fastest
hard drive on the market). Also surfing the internet on broadband
feels faster on a HyperDrive IV because, for example, Windows XP
checks thousands of cookies and temporary files as it surfs, so the
HyperDrive IV seek time advantage does make a difference in this
circumstance.
So in general everyday computing, the performance
advantage of the HyperDrive IV is that it halves the time the user
takes to click around the desktop, since the whole machine has a
vastly reduced latency to starting any new operation. This is
halving, not CPU processing time but human time, real worker time -
your time! Benchmarks do not generally measure this.
However there are certain specific applications
where the HyperDrive IV performance differential is monumental. We
list them below…
*On Line Transaction Processing, day trading, real
time financial transactions etc.
*Large database operations
*Photograph, image and video processing
*High fidelity audio processing (sound studios etc)
*High resolution graphics games
*Networks with several people accessing the same
data at the same time
Real world examples of this are medical scanner
image processing, flight simulators,finger print analysis, searching
massive email databases for security purposes etc.
The FBI has ordered the HyperDrive IV for testing
with its project Carnivore for example. The British Police enquired
about it for finger print recognition. Quantum 3D wanted to order
2,000 for flight simulators but they needed them before we finished
designing the HyperDrive IV. Siemens in Germany have enquired about
several thousand units for body scanners. If medical scanners used
Hyper Drives they could process images more quickly and perhaps
double patientthroughput. |
|
PC test results |
|
 |
|
[1] XP learns to open applications
and to start up more quickly with time by caching files and
repositioning files on the Hard Disk. But this is dependent upon
repeating the same operation regularly.
[2] Larger Photoshop and Database
operations would show a larger performance gap between the Raptors
and the H4.
[3] The PC used had an Athlon 64 3200
Intelahertz with nForce chipset and 6.53 drivers. Epox 9npa ultra
mobo. This is around 18 months out of date. The faster the PC the
more the differential between silicon and the hard disk. So the
greater need there is for an H4.
The H4 opens files and copies files
at around 2.5 times the speed of a Raptor. So it gives the single
user around a 250% real world performance improvement. The really
massive real world performance improvements occur in circumstances
which are very seek time dependent. For example…
[1] When several users need to access
the same data storage device. The HyperDrive IV can serve 200 people
in the time it takes a hard disk drive to serve one person. This is
because the magnetic arm on a hard disk drive cannot be in 200
places at once. But in the time it takes that arm to file one more
file (8 milliseconds) the HyperDrive IV can find 200 more files.
[2] When one user needs to carry out
millions of parallel operations such as image processing and audio
processing.
[3] When we are waiting in real time
for a computational process to take place. In this circumstance even
a doubling of performance can have a huge psychological and economic
effect. |

Other advantages of the HyperDrive IV.
[1] It is potentially silent. The
present version has two ultra-quiet small fans for cooling. But we
are designing a completely silent version for the future.
[2] It is more reliable than a Hard
disk drive having no moving parts. And it is more tolerant to shock
and vibration.
[3] It is user expandable as memory
modules increase in capacity. We can tweak the firmware to make the
present HyperDrive IV into a 32GB or a 64GB device as 4GB and 8GB
DDR sticks become available.
[4] Being random access devices,
HyperDrive IV’s do not need to be defragmented. Their performance
does not degrade with time! |
|
Servers/RAID.
The HyperDrive can be used in a RAID
array just like any other hard drive.
Advanced test results.
The HyperDrive IV seek time, as
measured by H2BenchW, is 40 microseconds. Whereas the Raptor could
only manage 8.9 milliseconds, which is over 200 times slower. HD
Tach (version 3.0.1.0) shows the following results. The HyperDrive
IV is in blue and the Western Digital Raptor is in red. The
Sequential read times 123.1 MB per second (Hyper Drive) and 64.9 MB
per second (Raptor) are the speed at which the devices can
continuously give or receive data. (HD Tach gives a seek time of
0.0ms for the HyperDrive instead of 0.04ms, because its seek time is
too fast to be measured in tenths of a millisecond. |
|
 |
| Volatility. |
|
The
HyperDrive IV has several methods of retaining data in the event of
a PC power down or an electricity supply power outage. It has its
own DC power supply. So when the PC is turned off it will not lose
its data. Our own software HyperOs 2007 has a scheduled backup
facility which can make a live backup of the HyperDrive IV (it backs
up the Windows system which is presently running!) to a hard drive
Partition automatically when scheduled. Then, in the event of a
power cut, we supply a Boot CDROM which fires up the PC and sector
copies the hard drive Partition back to the HyperDrive IV in
minutes. In addition to this the HyperDrive IV goes into sleep mode
when it loses main power. And it has a backup battery connector for
a small or large backup battery which can power it for 5 hours (5
Amp Hours) to 10 hours (10 Amp Hours). In addition to this the
HyperDrive IV has a laptop HDD connector for an internal laptop
drive. The laptop drive is mounted with 4 pillars which screw into
the drive and snap into the HyperDrive IV PCB. If a laptop drive is
in place then the HyperDrive IV will automatically copy its data to
the portable HDD in the event of a power outage using the backup
battery. Then when power is reconnected it will automatically copy
the data back onto the HyperDrive IV. |
|
Competitors.
[1] Gigabyte make the IRAM PCI card
with a SATA BUS. This can only take 4GB of DDR and needs motherboard
drivers. So it is not a true hard drive alternative. It only works
with certain motherboards and uses up 2 PCI slots. It freezes with
Intel’s IOMETER benchmark on nForce4 motherboards. However it is
cheap at around £120 if you just want to increase your system RAM.
[2] Texas Instruments make a 16GB
Fibre Channel Interface 19” Rack mounted storage device for $32,000.
[3] Curtis make the Nitro drive.
Which costs around $1,000 per Gigabyte and squeezes into a 3.5” HDD
form factor, but uses the old SCSI BUS and has an STR that is only
as fast as a Raptor since it uses an outdated interface between the
SCSI BUS and the DRAM controller.
Road map.
The HyperDrive IV loaded with 16GB of
RAM presently costs around £2,000, the price of a flat screen when
they first came out. It is at the beginning of its life cycle, and
it will follow the normal technology price curve (along with the
RAM). It can also presently utilise the full bandwidth of SATA 133
and will be able to continue this trend though all larger bandwidths
as they become available, whilst the poor old mechanical hard drive
will never be able to improve on around 65 MB per second STR which
is essentially ATA65. When you purchase an ATA133 HDD, you are
buying an ATA65 device. The next stage in technical development is
SATA2 and DDR2 but no release dates are available until sometime
next year.
XP Start up time on H4 versus WD
Raptor....
Windows XP SP2 with MSOffice and
Photoshop installed has a start up time from the XP Splash screen to
the desktop, (using EPOX 9NPA Ultra Mobo and 6.53 nforce4 drivers
and fast recognition CD ROM and SATA WD Raptor and latest 18th April
2006 Mobo BIOS) of 2.5 seconds on the H4 and 8 seconds on the WD
Raptor.
Windows Registry access on H4 versus
WD Raptor...
Running ‘Win move’, a HyperOs program
that rereferences the Windows registry when Windows is moved to a
new drive letter, takes 6 seconds on the H4 and 15 seconds on the WD
Raptor.
Conclusion.
The H4 gives a real world performance
boost of 200%-400% in circumstances where XP is unable to use the
Hard Disk Cache or system memory for a process. It gives a 200%-400%
performance boost in the start-up time of XP itself and of its
applications. So it also saves a lot of user time, the time that you
spend clicking around the desktop setting things up. To put this in
a proper perspective, if you go out and spend an extra £400 on a
faster CPU, the result will be a performance increase of perhaps
15%. Whereas if you purchase an H4 for £599, the result will be an
almost instant PC. Every process will be as fast as if it was cached
on your Hard Disk and run in system RAM. |
|
Contact HyperOS Systems On:
Phone - 0800 027 2002
Email -
info@HyperOsSystems.co.uk
www.HyperOsSystems.co.uk |
|
HyperDrive IV launch Document
November 2006 © HyperOS Systems Ltd 2006 |
| |
|